Thursday, May 29, 2014

Urdu Mushaira

Urdu Mushaira

Abordagem truculenta de policiais da UPP da Rocinha

Saturday, May 24, 2014

Behind the Komagata Maru’s fight to open Canada’s border

Dark chapter in Canadian immigration history included an unsung hero, among the first who can be called a defender of civil rights

Tuesday, May 6, 2014

The Horrific World of England's Workhouse (Full Documentary)

London's Forgotten Children: Thomas Coram and the Foundling Hospital - D...

Home Truths: Photography, Motherhood and Loss. Interview with Director A...

Reports from the 1950s of emotional problems in adoptees

 Wendy Jacobs, B.Sc., B.A.
"The past is never fully gone. It is absorbed into the present and the future. It stays to shape what we are and what we do." 
Sir William Deane, Inaugural Lingiari Lecture, Darwin, 22 August 1996.

Separating mother and child at birth was the way adoption was practiced in Australia in the latter half of last century. We have heard from other speakers about current knowledge regarding the mental health consequences of this separation. In this paper I look at adoption from a historical perspective, how adoption was practiced, what was known about the consequences of adoption, and what influence, if any, this knowledge had on adoption practice. 

Brief  history of adoption in Australia
 Adoption was a social experiment in which babies born to unmarried mothers were taken at birth and given to strangers for adoption. It was claimed to be in the best interests of the child, who would be protected from the slur of illegitimacy and would have a better life in the adoptive family. Adoption enabled infertile married couples to have a family, and the State saved money on its welfare bill.
 Adoption legislation was first introduced in Australia in the 1920s, but adoption was slow to be accepted, due to the belief that immorality and other evil tendencies were passed on from mother to child. After World War II, however, when environment was seen as more important than heredity in the development of the child, adoption became more popular. It was believed that mothers would not bond with their babies if the babies were taken immediately after birth, and the mothers were prevented from seeing them, and that babies would bond successfully with their adoptive families if they were placed as soon as possible after birth. All ties with the natural mother were then severed, the child was issued with a new birth certificate which showed him as being born to the adoptive parents, and the records were sealed.
 Adoption was promoted as being in the best interests of the child. Mothers were expected to forget about their child and get on with their lives, get married and have children of their own. Adoption was seen as an instant 'cure' for infertility. None of these beliefs was based on any scientific evidence. 

Reports from the 1950s of emotional problems in adoptees
 In fact there were reports from Britain and the USA, from 1952 onwards, that a large number of children seen in child guidance clinics and other psychiatric services were adopted.
 In 1952 a British psychiatrist, Wellisch, drew attention to a problem of adoption - the lack of knowledge of and definite relationship to one's genealogy, which he termed genealogical bewilderment, and which could result in the stunting of emotional development in adopted children and could lead them to irrational rebellion against their adoptive parents and the world as a whole, and eventually to delinquency. This was echoed in 1955 by Winnicott, who said ignorance about their personal origin made adolescence more of a strain for adopted children than other children, and in 1964 by Sants who wrote that genealogical bewilderment is a factor which frequently appears to be present in adoption stress.

Jimmy Carter unveils truth about Israel

CIA Agent Exposes How Al-Qaeda Dosen't Exist

Fake Al Qaeda Actors EXPOSED! Jewish Mossad tactics EXPOSED!.

Fake FBI "jihadist" website snares US teenager


Monday, May 5, 2014



When we think about slavery what comes to mind is the Trans-Atlantic Slavery Trade, captured Africans, transported to the West Indies and America to work mainly in the sugar plantations. Although that slavery was abolished in 19th century, slavery still exists today. Although its modern forms are different, when we talk about slavery we do not use a metaphor. 

According to the International Labour Organisation (ILO) 20.9 million men, women and children around the world are in slavery. In the 21st century people are still sold like objects, forced to work for little or no pay and at the complete mercy of their 'employers'.
There are many different characteristics that distinguish slavery from other human rights violations, however only one needs to be present for slavery to exist. Someone is in slavery if they are: 
  • forced to work - through mental or physical threat;
  • owned or controlled by an 'employer', usually through mental or physical abuse or the threat of abuse;
  • dehumanised, treated as a commodity or bought and sold as 'property';
  • physically constrained or has restrictions placed on his/her freedom of movement.
Contemporary slavery takes various forms and affects people of all ages, gender and races.

Read more    -----

: Beyond the Black Venus: Colonial Sexual Politics and ...